All artists are influenced by the previous generation of artists. Westerns were part of John Carpenter’s cinematic diet growing up. John Ford, Howard Hawks, these filmmakers were shaping cinema at the time, stamping out a movie language that would become the standard for anyone wishing the tell a story using cinema.
A fan of horror and science fiction movies such as The Thing from Another World and Forbidden Planet, John Carpenter defined another set of standards for a new generation of filmmakers. The modern horror genre is partly his offspring. Like his predecessors, Carpenter mastered the long game, building the tension until the big payoff.
Nowadays, it’s clear that motion pictures have devolved somewhat. Big budget Hollywood blockbusters lack most of the qualities that gave movies from the past the greatness they deservedly earned. Nowadays, even B-grade movies are more pathetic than ever. Low budget productions are missing the mark completely.
It’s as if the current batch of filmmakers have stopped learning from the best.
John Carpenter, like his musical compositions, is a back to basics, simplicity is best, approach to storytelling. His movies may have been hit and miss at the box office, I certainly put most of these down to budgetary restraints and timing; sometimes audiences are not ready for a certain kind of movie experience; but each of his films have merit and are entertaining, even decades later..
Dark Star (1974)
Despite the student-style, low budget aspect of the film, what Carpenter achieves here is a certain gritty realism. The character’s motives, and how they’ve degenerated into bored nihilistic crew members, makes sense. The plot is driven by the characters. Even the AI and Bomb-20 have a certain personality that adds to the unfolding drama.
The alien is a ridiculous looking beach ball thing, yet the director and actor manage to turn it into a menace employing a mix of frustration, comedy of errors, and an ingenious use of a corridor to deliver the element of danger of a bottomless shaft. The ending is bleak, avoiding cliques yet still delivering a satisfying conclusion in tune with how the characters were set up.
Assault on Precinct 13 (1976)
Was influenced by Hawks’ Rio Bravo (1959) and Romeo’s Night of the Living Dead (1968), both siege movies, and has gone to influence the way action films have been shot and edited ever since. Modern gun battles and depictions of violence from Die Hard to The Matrix owe a lot to this movie. Its one location, isolated and under siege by an insane gang of killer hoons.
Halloween (1978) Halloween II (1981)
Basically single-handily kick-started the the slasher horror films of the eighties and nineties. It’s the boogeyman brought to cinema audiences, and with it the template for film makers working within the slasher genre.
The sequel is the Carpenter’s desire to push the story into the realm of the unknown, turning the crazed killer into some unstoppable supernatural force. He also falls back on the isolated location technique having the whole story play out in a hospital.
The Fog (1980)
Want to make an atmospheric horror flick with a twist of the supernatural, then this flick has plenty of elements to learn from; building tension, ghostly cinematography, and ghost-zombie sieges.
Escape from New York (1981)
You can see how The Warriors (1979) use of location and design influenced Carpenter, and from here on you can list every post apocalypse/dystopian movie that had taken cues from Escape from New York. Burnt out decrepit urban landscape, punk rag wardrobe, hyper-attitude dialogue, and as far as anti-heroes are concerned, Snake Plissken – modelled on the Sergio Leone’s ‘Man with No Name‘ – has most likely fathered nearly all anti-heroes since this film.
The Thing (1982)
Ahead of it’s time in terms of storytelling, having pushed the boundaries of in-your-face gore and un-abating tension, audiences weren’t ready for the gritty realism, the honest dialogue and intense graphics.
Yet this is his best work.
Authenticity in the setting makes the fantastical horror that emerges later more intense. The banter and truthful reactions from the characters, the gore, these work if executed in the way Carpenter has done here.
Also, The Thing showcases the pinnacle of practical effects*. But Carpenter’s team, never rely on just the latex and puppetry, they incorporate lighting, camera angles and editing, and the cast’s reactions, to bring the horrors to life, and they do it well.
A study of this film is a must if a director really wants to get under the audience’s skin.
*Shame they didn’t allow the team behind The Thing (2011) to showcase their practical effects, instead the monster work was covered up with CGI.
How do you bring an automobile to life? Well, there’s Herbie, from the The Love Bug series, and there’s Christine.
Here Carpenter succeeds with Christine where many filmmakers adapting books consistently get it wrong. Not only is Christine a good adaptation of Steven King’s book, it’s is an improvement of the source material. Carpenter discards the irrelevant parts of the book and captures the essence of the story, visualising it for the big screen. This should be a basic rule of adapting books into movies.
This is how it’s done.
With Starman, the genre plays out in the background, while the cast takes the centre stage. Carpenter allows the characters, Jenny and her alien husband, to evolve.
Telling their story is the plot, and that’s a good takeaway, because when you have the plot based around action set-pieces or gimmicks, you’re likely to end up with boring trash. The audience has to care about the characters, otherwise the film is an empty period of time filled with purposeless spectacle.
Big Trouble in Little China (1986)
You’re tasked with bringing an action heavy mixed-genre motion picture to the screen. Let Jack Burton guide you.
Even when the fight choreography and effects spectacles drive the plot, it still requires likeable characters to link it all together. The protagonist is flawed and balanced out with the supporting characters. Jack is the hero, yet Gracie and Wang do a lot of the heavy lifting ‘and thinking,’ but because he’s willing to risk everything to help the good guys (albeit reluctantly) he’s given the credit. A unique anti-hero of sorts, not seen very much in modern cinema.
Prince of Darkness* (1987)
Evil entities, zombie sieges, isolated scientists, the blending of science and the supernatural, bleak urban setting, jump scares, building tension, effective practical effects, this film combines all of the elements that make Carpenter’s movies entertaining. He’s at his best here, pulling no punches, so if you use this one as a study guide, it covers it all.
They Live (1988)
There was never any heavy politics in Carpenter’s work, he just worked in themes such as, the boogeyman is gonna get ya, never fuck with the supernatural, and that totalitarianism can be bad yet bad-ass as well.
Here, however, Carpenter dives right into the fray, basically directly accusing the elites of this world of colluding with the enemy, in this case, aliens. I guess that’s why I ended up seeing this at a small indy cinema at the edge of town, the establishment weren’t too pleased so they squashed this film and seemingly, his career.
Yet, this is how to make a social statement that echoes well into the future, (look at how our society is mimicking this world thirty years later). You need to be direct, have good one-liners and plenty of action, and be as honest as possible.
Memoirs of an Invisible Man (1992)
Pressed to do a paycheck genre film? Here Carpenter ticks as many boxes as he can. He gets the effects and action right, they still look good to this day. The story takes its time, building it up as it progresses.
The Invisible Man has been around since H.G Wells created him. The Universal films of the 1930’s had the effects down pretty good. So do your research, stay true to the genre and keep the story centred on the protagonist. Carpenter does this here and what we got is a film still entertaining decades later.
In the Mouth of Madness* (1994)
Bending reality. Just when you thought one couldn’t pioneer and blend genres any further, Carpenter does it again. Again, inspired by two previous masters of horror, H.P Lovecraft and Steven King, this film is a goldmine of Carpenter’s cinematic techniques.
Village of the Damned (1995)
Got a remake to do? Carpenter’s rule number two; don’t change or mess with the original source material. It’s ridiculous how remakes are drastically different from the origins. That’s why they suck. If you’re going to force in a different concept, make a new movie, don’t squat on the brand name.
Escape from L.A. (1996)
Rule #3. If you’re going to remake one of you’re own films, and can’t be stuffed working out a new story to tell or direction to take you’re anti-hero, then go with the original script, tweak it a little, and call it a sequel.
The thing is with John Carpenter, even when shackled with a limited budget and technology, he sure doesn’t shy away from being ambitious. Do the same film today, with the same budget and script, you’d easily sell earthquakes and surfing a tsunami to Snake Plissken fans.
Combining genres? Having read the book before watching the film adaptation, it was the first time I got see The Carpenter’s choices play out. Again, he takes the coolest aspects of the novel and morphs it to fit his own mythology. What’s interesting, John Steakley’s 1990’s Vampire$ reads as if it’s been heavily influenced by Carpenter, complete with zombie/ghoul sieges and bleak ending. The choices made are kinda understandable considering he wanted to make more of a western, but…
…take away the vampire element, this would be the type of western he would make.
Ghosts of Mars (2001)
John Carpenter rips off his own work here, gratuitously and shamelessly. The whole film is a catalogue of his techniques, that while it doesn’t come together at all, it’s does help to identify them. You can recognise aspects of every one of his films, from visuals, action choreography, story, motifs, right down to the outright cheese.
The Ward (2010)
Ten years on, and Carpenter sticks to what he knows best. Jump scares, gritty isolated setting, ghost stories, paranoia, all typical Carpenter, and it was competing in an age where horror movies are massively influence by him.
The Carpenter’s Techniques
- Gritty Setting
- Slow build up of Tension
- Siege by hordes of zombies/possessed
- Unstoppable Killer Stalkers
- Ghostly Atmosphere
- Criminal Anti-hero
- A lurking Alien Horror that possesses/takes over individuals
- A grim sense of Paranoia.
- Evil Ghost Possession.
- Infectious Madness
- Comedic One-liners
- Big Fight Scene.
- Big Gun Battles
- Isolated group fighting to survive.
- Strange Politics
- Unusual Casting
- Lovecraft homages
- Gruesome/Gory Practical Effects
- Western Elements.
These are just a few, there a more examples, many having been incorporated as standard in most genre movies. Point is, don’t just copy The Carpenter – innovate, create new cinematic languages, but learn from the best.